AEW star MVP has been vocal about his disdain for WWE Chief Content Officer Paul "Triple H" Levesque, and his recent comments on the latest episode of Marking Out with MVP & Dwayne Swayze have sparked further debate. MVP's criticism centers around Triple H's perceived inability to elevate other wrestlers, a skill he contrasts with The Undertaker's prowess in helping other stars get over.
During the show, MVP addressed the question of whether a wrestler who knows how to make other stars is more valuable than one who only knows how to get himself over. He used The Undertaker as an example of a top guy who has a long list of other stars he helped get over, including less-skilled workers like The Great Khali. In stark contrast, MVP highlighted Triple H's lack of success in this regard, asking the audience to name more than a handful of wrestlers he has helped get over.
MVP's disdain for Triple H's management style is evident in his description of Triple H's finish in a match with Jeff Hardy, which he deems a "dick move" reminiscent of Hulk Hogan's tactics. He argues that Triple H's actions, such as making Vince McMahon ask him to lose and put someone else over, showcase his lack of genuine concern for the well-being of other wrestlers.
MVP's commentary extends beyond personal opinion, delving into the broader implications of Triple H's leadership. He suggests that Triple H's overrated status is further evidenced by his reign of terror in 2003, which permanently damaged his reputation in the eyes of many. MVP's perspective is that Triple H's ability to get himself over does not translate to his ability to elevate others, a skill that The Undertaker, among others, possesses.
The article concludes by inviting readers to share their thoughts on the matter, questioning whether The Undertaker truly surpasses Triple H in terms of helping other stars get over. MVP's analysis and personal interpretation of Triple H's career and management style offer a unique and engaging perspective on the wrestling industry, blending factual information with heavy commentary and insight.
